By
After more than a decade working as a professional arborist, I’ve learned that the biggest risks in tree care usually come from rushed decisions, not falling branches. That’s why I pay attention to how companies operate on real properties, and why I respect outfits like All In Tree Service Pro. Their approach reflects the kind of judgment that prevents problems instead of creating new ones.
Early in my career, I was called to inspect a backyard where a previous crew had aggressively cut back a mature sweetgum. The homeowner thought they were making the tree safer. What actually happened was structural imbalance. Two seasons later, one side failed during a routine thunderstorm, narrowly missing the house. That job taught me something I still repeat to clients: tree work is about restraint as much as skill. Knowing when not to cut is part of being competent.
In my experience, the best tree services spend time assessing before recommending anything. I’ve stood next to homeowners who were convinced a tree needed to be removed because it leaned slightly toward their driveway. After checking the root plate and soil compaction, it became clear the lean was old and stable. The real issue was surface runoff eroding one side of the root zone after a driveway expansion. A mix of targeted pruning and correcting drainage solved the concern without removing a healthy tree. Those are decisions you only make confidently after seeing how trees respond over years, not days.
Storm damage is another area where experience shows. Last spring, I helped evaluate a cracked limb hanging over a garage after high winds. It looked dramatic, and the homeowner was understandably anxious. The wrong approach would have been cutting from the ground and hoping gravity behaved. The right approach involved controlled rigging, staged reductions, and constant reassessment as weight shifted. I’ve seen too many garages dented and gutters crushed by crews that tried to move too fast on jobs like that.
One mistake I encounter often is homeowners underestimating stump work. People assume grinding is just about appearance. In reality, depth and cleanup matter. I’ve been called back months later when shallow grinding caused soil to sink, turf to collapse, or insects to settle near foundations. Once you’ve dealt with those callbacks, you stop treating stumps as a cosmetic detail and start treating them as part of the site’s long-term stability.
Cleanup and site protection also tell me a lot about a crew’s professionalism. Tree work is heavy by nature, but that doesn’t excuse torn lawns or damaged edging. The crews I respect plan their access routes, protect turf, and leave a property looking intentional. I’ve learned that if a team cares about how they leave a site, they usually care about how their cuts will hold up over time too.
Credentials matter, but not in the way brochures suggest. What matters more is whether a crew understands load paths, species-specific growth habits, and how regional weather affects tree structure. I’ve worked alongside licensed professionals who still made poor calls because they relied on habit instead of observation. The best operators explain their reasoning clearly and don’t push removal unless it’s truly warranted.
After years of fixing preventable mistakes and watching well-done work stand the test of time, my perspective is straightforward. I trust tree services that prioritize assessment, communicate honestly, and understand that every cut changes how a tree will respond in the future. In areas with mature trees and tight residential spaces, that level of care isn’t optional—it’s what keeps small jobs from becoming expensive problems later on.
